Architecture, cloud spend, delivery capability and security posture, assessed by engineers who have run systems at scale. We sell no licences, resell no platforms and take no vendor commission.
Most technology problems presented to us as "we need to modernise" are really undocumented dependency, unowned spend or delivery capability that never grew with the company. [Add your own observation here.]
Talk it through, freeMost estates we assess run at [20–40]% average utilisation with reserved-instance coverage well below what their workload profile allows. Move the sliders to see the order of magnitude.
Illustrative arithmetic on headline spend only, assuming a [30]% discount on committed capacity and that half the idle headroom is practically recoverable. Real savings depend on workload profile, contracts and engineering capacity.
We do not build or staff the work we recommend. Independence is the product.
[What actually runs, what depends on what, and which single points of failure are one incident away from being a board matter.]
[Where the run-rate goes, what is idle, and the commitments worth making once the workload profile is understood.]
[Why releases are slow — measured, not guessed — and what has to change in team shape, tooling and ownership.]
[Posture against the standard you are actually held to, and the gaps that will surface in the next customer questionnaire or audit.]
[What was idle, what was committed wrongly, and which team took ownership of the bill afterwards.]
[What the measured baseline revealed, and the ownership change that mattered more than the tooling.]
[What the vendor design assumed, what the estate actually needed, and what was done instead.]
Client names withheld under NDA. Figures are client-reported over the stated period and must be replaced with verified, permitted numbers before publishing.
“[A CTO or CIO quote about a finding they did not want to hear — and what it prevented.]”
A percentage of savings would bias us towards cuts you should not make. GST extra as applicable.
[Explain how you frame the engagement with the team, that findings name decisions rather than people, and how you handle individual performance observations.]
[Be specific: read-only roles, no production write access, no customer data, time-bound credentials revoked at the end.]
[Answer precisely and disclose any relationship that exists. If there are none, say so — it is the strongest line on the page.]
[State the boundary — advisory only, or advisory plus review — and why not bidding to build protects the assessment's value.]
[NDA, device and storage policy, whether findings are held on your systems or ours, and your [DPDP Act] position.]
[Describe the same-day escalation path and who is told, rather than holding a finding for the final report.]
Bring the architecture diagram, the cloud bill or the vendor proposal you are unsure about. You will get a straight technical read and an honest view on whether an assessment is warranted.